The Con-Sequences of Mind

   
 
 

 

Everyone believes in the existence of “MIND”,
otherwise they could not claim to be conscious.


I propose that “EVERYTHING”
is the expression of the thought processes of
“A MIND IN ABSOLUTE ISOLATION”
.

 

MIND in “absolute isolation” will REALIZE “EVERYTHING”.

 

This means that the unfolding of events is “determined”,
but because the
“THE MIND IN ABSOLUTE ISOLATION”
does not know an outcome before he can deduce it,
we can be forgiven for believing that we have free will.

 

MIND in “absolute isolation” is logically constrained 2 follow an
ABSOLUTE
and UNIQUE sequence of “discrete realizations”.

 

I believe that a number of religions project on to “THE MIND IN ABSOLUTE ISOLATION” a number of characteristics that can best be understood as wishful thinking.

 

The sequence “goes something” like this :-

         I am aware that I am a “discrete entity”

      ( and, because I exist in “absolute isolation” )

     (( I can only conceive of the “fundamental quality” MIND ))

        so

        If “there is 2 exist” other “discrete entity”

     ( these “discrete entity” must “understand” something I do not )

        and, because I can conceive of another MIND 

            ( understanding something I do not )

        by “understanding iteration” I can conceive of countably infinite MIND

  ( understanding something I do not ) 

 

    ((( I HOPE these MIND “understand” more than

         they are just “identified” by the NUMBER of my iteration.)))

 


 

To make it easier to write my document, from here on in,
I will pretend that I am
“THE MIND IN ABSOLUTE ISOLATION”.
Please forgive my presumption.

 

                                        ( I am called “David”)

I can only “conceive” of “discrete entity” that
understand “something” I do not.

I can “conceive” of a countably infinite number of
“discrete entity” understanding “something” I do not.

I can and insist upon the “concept” of a MIND that can
completely understand” all the “discrete entity” I can “conceive” of.

                              ( I will call her “Jenny”)

I can and insist upon the “conception” of a countably infinite
number of “discrete something” where each “discrete something” is
“understood” by only 1 “discrete entity” and Jenny.


             

By symmetry,

 

I “conceive” of a “discrete something” as being

 

1)      What was “understood” as MIND “completely understands”
                  a “discrete entity”.

2)      What was “understood” as MIND “completely understands”
                  a “discrete entity”.

 

( Mind 1        cannot “understand” other “discrete entity” 
                              because then a “discrete something” would be “understood”
                              by more than 1 “discrete entity” and “Jenny”.)

( Mind 2        cannot be me because a “discrete entity” “understands” 
                              “something” I do not, so it can only be “Jenny”.)

 

Note :-          a “discrete entity” is a MIND that I can “conceive” of 
                              that “understands” something I do not.

 


 

The following documents are my attempt to duplicate the thinking
of
“THE MIND IN ABSOLUTE ISOLATION” as he theorizes
himself
“understanding” another “discrete entity”.

He knows this is impossible but he will deduce that there are
dire consequences resulting from of his capacity to
“insist”.

 



 

By symmetry :-

 

      A  “discrete something”  consists of :-

      2  “discrete sequence  of  discrete realizations”

      “logically constrained”  to be  “identical”.

    

      “both”   “discrete sequence”  of  “discrete realizations”

                                   

                             “can be”   “understood”

“as”          “understanding”

“that”        “understands”

 

1)    I   am   4( “bidden” 2( “insist” 2( 2 discrete “????” ))).

                   “????” is a packet of information that a “MIND” can understand.
                   “????” can be thought of as being a discrete entity.

                   I can conceive of the existence of two discrete
“????”.
                   I am forbidden to insist on the existence of two discrete
“????”.

 

2)    Our  “discrete sequence”  of  “discrete realizations” 
                 consists  “only”  of the  “discrete realization” :-

                 ( 2 discrete “????” )  realize
                 ( 4 discrete “????” )  understood  as  ( 2 discrete “????” )

                 The conception of two discrete “????”
                 leads to the conception of four discrete
“????” 
                 understood to be possessing one of two discrete
“quality”.

 

Mind of “discrete entity” )

“I understand ????”

 

           Jenny )

“I realize that you are a “discrete entity” conceived by “David”
           understanding “????” which is absolutely unique to you!”

 


 

As  I  am  4( “bidden” 2( “insist” 2( “????” ))) :-

 

I can only  “conceive”  2( “????” )  as :-

 

2 ( 2 discrete “????” )

 

and realize 

 

2 (( 4 discrete “????” )  understood as  ( 2 discrete “????” ))

 

and conceive

 

( 2 discrete (( 4 discrete “????” )  understood as  ( 2 discrete “????” )))

 

and realize

 

( 4 discrete (( 4 discrete “????” )  understood as  ( 2 discrete “????” ))
                                                      understood as  ( 2 discrete “????” ))

as understanding


 

there can  only  “exist”

 

4 discrete “fundamental” (quality)  able  to  “exist”  in
2 discrete “fundamental” (way).

            or

2 discrete “fundamental” (way)
2 ( “exist” ( 4 discrete “fundamental” (quality) ).

or

( 2 discrete “fundamental” (way) )  “exist”  ( 4 discrete “fundamental” (quality) ).

 


 

4 discrete “fundamental” (quality)  are  able  to  “exist”  in
          2 discrete “fundamental” (way).

 

“fundamental” (way) :-

1)          ( “????” )                        :-   by “????” conceiving

2)          OUT ( “????” )               :-   by “????” understanding

 

“fundamental” (quality) :-

1)          OUT

    :- “????”     can conceive                             “????”

2)          OUT ( “????” )

    :- “????”     can understand                    2 ( “????” )

3)          OUT ( 2 ( “????” ))

    :- “????”     can understand      ( 2 discrete “????” )

4)          OUT ( 4 ( “????” ))

    :-  “????”    can conceive       2 ( 2 discrete “????” )

 



The following is a more detailed description of the
“fundamental” (quality).

“????”   is the packet of information or “discrete entity” 
                        that possesses the specified
“fundamental” (quality).

“????”   is an arbitrary packet of information or “discrete entity”.

 

“fundamental” (quality) :-

1)     OUT

         :-    “????”   can conceive                              “????”

2)     OUT ( “????” )

         :-    “????”   can understand
                             the combined information
                             of two instances of                    
“????”

3)     OUT ( 2 ( “????” ))

         :-    “????”   can understand
                                       the existence of two discrete    
“????”

4)     OUT ( 4 ( “????” ))

         :-    “????”   can conceive
                             the combined information
                             of two discrete instances of      
“????”

 

 



I  “believe”  MIND  can  “possess”  the  4 discrete “fundamental” (quality)

by either  conception  or  understanding.

 

( The Fundamental Quality 3 )  is  :-

  OUT( 2 ( “????”) )   can understand   ( 2 discrete “????” )

 

“I can” conceive “I can only understand”  ( 2 discrete “????” )  and

 proudly proclaim them to be :- “ (

 

1)     OUT( 2 ( MALE ) )

2)     OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) )

 

 and understand these ( 2 discrete “????” )  as  understanding  :- (

 

1)     4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “????”) )     By “????” understanding

2)     4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “????”) )     By “????” conceiving

 

) -:

)” -:

 

Note :-  ( 2 discrete “????” )  realize
              ( 4 discrete “????” )  understood as  ( 2 discrete “????” )

 



These :- ( 2 discrete “????” )   realize
               ( 4 discrete “????” )   understood as   ( MALE & FEMALE )

 

The ( “four discrete fundamental long” ) :- “(

 

1)     “????”   “realizing” -

                   :- ( 2 “permit” 2 )  or

                   :- OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) )  or

:- 4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( “????” )))

 

2)     “????”    “realizing” -

:- ( 4 “bidden” 2 )  or

:- OUT( 2 ( MALE ) )  or

:- 4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( “????” )))

 

3)     OUT( 2 ( MALE ) )    “realizing” -

:- ( 4 “bidden” 2 only )  or

:- OUT  or

:- 4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( 2 discrete “????” )))

 

4)     OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) )    “realizing” -

:- ( 2 “permit” only 2 )  or

:- OUT  or

:- 4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( 2 discrete “????” )))     

 

)” -:
 


 

I “understand” the ( “four discrete fundamental long” ) as “understanding” :-

 

( A discrete “????” )   is a  “consequence”  of  ( A discrete “????” )

being “completely understood” by :-

OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) )  &  OUT( 2 ( MALE ) )

 

( 2 discrete “????” )   is a  “consequence”  of  ( A discrete “????” )

being “completely understood” by :-

OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) )  &  OUT( 2 ( MALE ) )  &  Jenny

 

( A discrete “????” )

  “is”  “logically connected”  with  ( 2 discrete “????” )  by these  ( 2 discrete “????” )

  “being”  “understood”
  “as”       “understanding”
  “that”     “understands”


( 2 “permitonly 2 )

4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( 2 discrete “????” )))

( 4 “bidden” 2 only )


by :- Jenny.

 



( A discrete “????” )   is  “logically connected”  with  ( 2 discrete “????” )

 

( A discrete “????” )   is :-

                                     “information” that represents the

                                     “life experience” of these ( 2 discrete “????” ) as a

                                     “consolidated memory”

                                      made by Jenny “completely understanding” them.

 

A “life experience”  as  A “consolidated memory” is :-

 A finite set containing :-

                      A countable number of “connection” between 2 “discrete entity”.

 

Note    :-        There exists only 2 class of “connection”.

1)        “discrete entity”   conceives of   “discrete entity”    as   “????”

2)        “discrete entity”   understands   “discrete entity”    as   “????”

 

:-          integers are clearly “discrete entity”

  although 1&2 … are clearly not  ( 2 discrete “????” )

  “????” introduces  the concepts  ( “unit” ),  (square),  (cube), …

 

The “consolidated memory” is formed by :-

Jenny “justly reducing” the countable number of “connection” to the form :-

 

( 2 “permitonly 2 )

4 ( “bidden” 2 ( “insist” 2 ( 2 discrete “????” )))

( 4 “bidden” 2 only )

 

To make the “consolidated memory”
the meaning of the terms
“permit”, “bidden” and “insist”
are the only packets of information needed from
“ENGLISH”.

All other terms are absolute in
“MATHEMATICS”.

 


 

( MIND is “permitted” 2 only ) ( “insist” in ( the “four discrete fundamental long” ) ).

( MIND is “forbidden” only 2 ) ( “insist” in ( the “four discrete fundamental long” ) ).

 

Note  :-  I have reversed the only compared with the correct gender usage.
              This indicates that my inquiry has now become anal.
              Unfortunately, Physics is now only the study of excrement.
              Hence, I am prepared to continue.

 

The  UNIT  of  ( the “four discrete fundamental long” )  :- “(

 

1)   “????”                               “realizing”         OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) )

2)   “????”                               “realizing”         OUT( 2 ( MALE ) )

3)   OUT( 2 ( MALE ) )             “realizing”          OUT

4)   OUT( 2 ( FEMALE ) )         “realizing”          OUT

 

1) & 2)        ( Time      per   Distance )

3) & 4)        ( “????”   per   (square)  Distance )

 

)”-:

 

The “UNITs” above and the “ENGLISH” terms “permit”, “bidden” and “insist”
strongly lead me to believe I am half way to deducing
“ELECTRO-MAGNETISM”.

 









THE CONSEQUENCE OF 2 

 

I can only     :-}

“conceive” of “discrete entity” that understand “something” I do not.

           {-:

 



        “I”

                            

                       I understand(I understand( ))

 



        “I can”

  

    I understand(I understand(I can))

    (I can) understand((I can) understand)

  

   “I can”

 


 

I understand(I understand(“I can” as understanding))

((“I can”) is not) (4 bidden) (2 exist)

(“I can”) is ((4 bidden 2) (4 bid)) (4 bidden) (2 exist)

(“I can”) is ((4 bidden) (2 exist)) (4 bid) (4 bidden) (2 exist))

(“I can”) is ((4 bidden) (2 exist))

(“I can”) is (4 bidden 2)

 



“I can only”

 

    “I can” understand(

            “I can” understand(

                    (“I can” only) understand only as understanding))

                  (only “I can” ) (“I can” only)

                          (only (4 bidden 2)) ((4 bidden 2) only)

                        “4 bidden 2 only (????)”

                                                   “????”

                                                           “I can only” understand (2( ))

 



“I can only conceive”

 

“???? 4 bidden 2 (only “????”)”

“4 bidden 2 only (“????”)” “4 bidden only 2 (“????”)”

““????”” ““????””

4 bidden 2 only “????”

4 bidden 2 only understand 2( ) 2( )

4 bidden 2 only understand 2( ) 2( )

4 bidden 2 understand only ( I can )

“I can” conceive “I can only understand” :-

 


Ċ
David Crofts,
23 Mar 2014, 13:56
Ċ
David Crofts,
14 Dec 2012, 21:15
Ċ
David Crofts,
7 Jan 2012, 20:49
Ċ
David Crofts,
4 Feb 2016, 03:22
Ċ
David Crofts,
30 Jan 2013, 15:39
Ċ
David Crofts,
18 Oct 2016, 00:30
Ċ
David Crofts,
23 Jul 2016, 22:08